The repo for reproducing Seed-driven Document Ranking for Systematic Reviews: A Reproducibility Study

Last update: Mar 31, 2022

Related tags

Overview

ECIR Reproducibility Paper: Seed-driven Document Ranking for Systematic Reviews: A Reproducibility Study

This code corresponds to the reproducibility paper: "Seed-driven Document Ranking for Systematic Reviews: A Reproducibility Study" and all results gathered from the paper are generated using the code.

Environment setup:

This project is implemented and tested only for python version 3.6.12, other python versions are not tested and can not ensure the full run of the results.

First please install the required packages:

pip3 install -r requirements.txt

Query&Eval generation:

First please clone the TAR repository using the command

git clone https://github.com/CLEF-TAR/tar.git

The data that's been used include the following files:

For 2017:
tar/tree/master/2017-TAR/training/qrels/qrel_content_train
tar/tree/master/2017-TAR/testing/qrels/qrel_content_test.txt
Please cat these two files together to make 2017_full.txt

For 2018:
tar/tree/master/2018-TAR/Task2/Training/qrels/full.train.content.2018.qrels
tar/tree/master/2018-TAR/Task2/Testing/qrels/full.test.content.2018.qrels
Please cat these two files together to make 2018_full.txt

For 2019:
tar/tree/master/2019-TAR/Task2/Training/Intervention/qrels/full.train.int.content.2019.qrels
tar/tree/master/2019-TAR/Task2/Testing/Intervention/qrels/full.test.int.content.2019.qrels
Please cat these two files together to make 2019_full.txt, and also 2019_test.txt (note for 2019 these two will be the same)

Then you can generate query and evaluation files by:

For snigle:
python3 topic_query_generation.py --input_qrel qrel_file_for_training+testing --input_test_qrel qrel_file_for_testing --DATA_DIR output_dir

For multiple:
python3 topic_query_generation_multiple.py --input_qrel qrel_file_for_training+testing --input_test_qrel qrel_file_for_testing --DATA_DIR output_dir

Please note: you need to generate for each year and put it in a separate folder, not the overall one.

Collection generation:

For BOW collection generation, the following command is needed

python3 gather_all_pids.py --filenames 2017_full.txt+2018_full.txt+2019_full.txt --output_dir collection/pid_dir --chunks n
python3 collection_gathering.py --filename yourpidsfile --email [email protected] --output output_collection
python3 collection_processing.py --input_collection acquired_collection_file --output_collection processed_file(default is weighted1_bow.jsonl)

Then for BOC collection generation:

First ensure to check Quickumls to gather umls data.
Second ensure to register on NCBO to get api keys, and fill in these keys in ncbo_request_word.py
For BOC collection then, run the following command to generation boc_collection:

python3 ncbo_request_word.py --input_collection your_generated_bow_collection --num_workers for_multi_procesing --generated_collection output_dir_ncbo
cat output_dir/* > ncbo.tsv
python3 processing_uml.py --input_collection your_bow_collection --input_umls_dir your_output_umls_dir --num_workers for_multi_procesing
python3 processing_umls_word.py --input_collection your_generated_bow_collection --input_umls_dir your_output_umls_dir_from_last_step --output_file umls.tsv
python3 boc_extraction.py --input_collection bow_collection --input_ncbo_collection ncbo.tsv --input_umls_collection umls.tsv --output_collection processed_file(default is weighted1_boc.jsonl)

RQ1: Does the effectiveness of SDR generalise beyond the CLEF TAR 2017 dataset?

For RQ1, single seed driven results are acquired for clef tar 2017, 2018, 2019, for this please run the following command.

bash search.sh 2017_single_data_dir all
bash search.sh 2018_single_data_dir test
bash search.sh 2019_single_data_dir test

to get the run_file of all three years single seed run_file with all methods.

Then evaluation by:

bash evaluation_full.sh 2017_single_data_dir all
bash evaluation_full.sh 2018_single_data_dir test
bash evaluation_full.sh 2019_single_data_dir test

to print out evaluation measures and also save evaluation measurement files in the corresponding eval folder

RQ2: What is the impact of using multiple seed studies collectively on the effectiveness of SDR?

For RQ2, multiple seed driven results are acquired for clef tar 2017, 2018, 2019, for this please run the following command.

bash search_multiple.sh 2017_multiple_data_dir all
bash search_multiple.sh 2018_multiple_data_dir test
bash search_multiple.sh 2019_multiple_data_dir test

to get the run_file of all three years multiple seed run_file with all methods.

Then evaluation by:

bash evaluation_full.sh 2017_multiple_data_dir all
bash evaluation_full.sh 2018_multiple_data_dir test
bash evaluation_full.sh 2019_multiple_data_dir test

to print out evaluation measures and also save evaluation measurement files in the corresponding eval folder

RQ3: To what extent do seed studies impact the ranking stability of single- and multi-SDR?

For this question, we need to use the results acquired from the last two steps, in which we can generate variability graphs by using the following command:

python3 graph_making/distribution_graph.py --year 2017 --type oracle 
python3 graph_making/distribution_graph.py --year 2018 --type oracle 
python3 graph_making/distribution_graph.py --year 2019 --type oracle

to get distribution graphs of the three years.

Generated run files:

Run files are generated and stored in here, feel free to download for verification or futher research needs.

Example:
run_files/2017/all: 2017 single seed results file
run_files/2017/multiple: 2017 multiple seed results file

The repo for reproducing Seed-driven Document Ranking for Systematic Reviews: A Reproducibility Study

Related tags

Overview

ECIR Reproducibility Paper: Seed-driven Document Ranking for Systematic Reviews: A Reproducibility Study

Environment setup:

Query&Eval generation:

Collection generation:

RQ1: Does the effectiveness of SDR generalise beyond the CLEF TAR 2017 dataset?

RQ2: What is the impact of using multiple seed studies collectively on the effectiveness of SDR?

RQ3: To what extent do seed studies impact the ranking stability of single- and multi-SDR?

Generated run files:

Owner

ielab

This implementation contains the application of GPlearn's symbolic transformer on a commodity futures sector of the financial market.

Codebase of deep learning models for inferring stability of mRNA molecules

Compute FID scores with PyTorch.

CMT: Convolutional Neural Networks Meet Vision Transformers

Implementation of paper "Decision-based Black-box Attack Against Vision Transformers via Patch-wise Adversarial Removal"

LSTM model trained on a small dataset of 3000 names written in PyTorch

A task Provided by A respective Artenal Ai and Ml based Company to complete it

Justmagic - Use a function as a method with this mystic script, like in Nim

2021:"Bridging Global Context Interactions for High-Fidelity Image Completion"

Easy to use Python camera interface for NVIDIA Jetson

3D HourGlass Networks for Human Pose Estimation Through Videos

A hobby project which includes a hand-gesture based virtual piano using a mobile phone camera and OpenCV library functions

A new version of the CIDACS-RL linkage tool suitable to a cluster computing environment.

Unofficial PyTorch Implementation of "Augmenting Convolutional networks with attention-based aggregation"

TEDSummary is a speech summary corpus. It includes TED talks subtitle (Document), Title-Detail (Summary), speaker name (Meta info), MP4 URL, and utterance id

Efficient Two-Step Networks for Temporal Action Segmentation (Neurocomputing 2021)

A simple and extensible library to create Bayesian Neural Network layers on PyTorch.

PixelPyramids: Exact Inference Models from Lossless Image Pyramids (ICCV 2021)

Offcial repository for the IEEE ICRA 2021 paper Auto-Tuned Sim-to-Real Transfer.

Official code base for the poster "On the use of Cortical Magnification and Saccades as Biological Proxies for Data Augmentation" published in NeurIPS 2021 Workshop (SVRHM)