Python implementation of Weng-Lin Bayesian ranking, a better, license-free alternative to TrueSkill
This is a port of the amazing openskill.js package.
Installation
pip install openskill
Usage
>>> from openskill import Rating, rate
>>> a1 = Rating()
>>> a1
Rating(mu=25, sigma=8.333333333333334)
>>> a2 = Rating(mu=32.444, sigma=5.123)
>>> a2
Rating(mu=32.444, sigma=5.123)
>>> b1 = Rating(43.381, 2.421)
>>> b1
Rating(mu=43.381, sigma=2.421)
>>> b2 = Rating(mu=25.188, sigma=6.211)
>>> b2
Rating(mu=25.188, sigma=6.211)
If a1 and a2 are on a team, and wins against a team of b1 and b2, send this into rate:
>>> [[x1, x2], [y1, y2]] = rate([[a1, a2], [b1, b2]])
>>> x1, x2, y1, y2
([28.669648436582808, 8.071520788025197], [33.83086971107981, 5.062772998705765], [43.071274808241974, 2.4166900452721256], [23.149503312339064, 6.1378606973362135])
You can also create Rating objects by importing create_rating:
>>> from openskill import create_rating
>>> x1 = create_rating(x1)
>>> x1
Rating(mu=28.669648436582808, sigma=8.071520788025197)
Ranks
When displaying a rating, or sorting a list of ratings, you can use ordinal:
>>> from openskill import ordinal
>>> ordinal(mu=43.07, sigma=2.42)
35.81
By default, this returns mu - 3 * sigma, showing a rating for which there's a 99.7% likelihood the player's true rating is higher, so with early games, a player's ordinal rating will usually go up and could go up even if that player loses.
Artificial Ranks
If your teams are listed in one order but your ranking is in a different order, for convenience you can specify a ranks option, such as:
>>> a1 = b1 = c1 = d1 = Rating()
>>> result = [[a2], [b2], [c2], [d2]] = rate([[a1], [b1], [c1], [d1]], rank=[4, 1, 3, 2])
>>> result
[[[20.96265504062538, 8.083731307186588]], [[27.795084971874736, 8.263160757613477]], [[24.68943500312503, 8.083731307186588]], [[26.552824984374855, 8.179213704945203]]]
It's assumed that the lower ranks are better (wins), while higher ranks are worse (losses). You can provide a score instead, where lower is worse and higher is better. These can just be raw scores from the game, if you want.
Ties should have either equivalent rank or score.
>>> a1 = b1 = c1 = d1 = Rating()
>>> result = [[a2], [b2], [c2], [d2]] = rate([[a1], [b1], [c1], [d1]], score=[37, 19, 37, 42])
>>> result
[[[24.68943500312503, 8.179213704945203]], [[22.826045021875203, 8.179213704945203]], [[24.68943500312503, 8.179213704945203]], [[27.795084971874736, 8.263160757613477]]]
Choosing Models
The default model is PlackettLuce. You can import alternate models from openskill.models like so:
>>> from openskill.models import BradleyTerryFull
>>> a1 = b1 = c1 = d1 = Rating()
>>> rate([[a1], [b1], [c1], [d1]], rank=[4, 1, 3, 2], model=BradleyTerryFull)
[[[17.09430584957905, 7.5012190693964005]], [[32.90569415042095, 7.5012190693964005]], [[22.36476861652635, 7.5012190693964005]], [[27.63523138347365, 7.5012190693964005]]]
Predicting Winners
You can compare two or more teams to get the probabilities of each team winning.
>>> from openskill import predict_win
>>> a1 = Rating()
>>> a2 = Rating(mu=33.564, sigma=1.123)
>>> predictions = predict_win(teams=[[a1], [a2]])
>>> predictions
[0.45110901512761536, 0.5488909848723846]
>>> sum(predictions)
1.0
Available Models
BradleyTerryFull: Full Pairing for Bradley-TerryBradleyTerryPart: Partial Pairing for Bradley-TerryPlackettLuce: Generalized Bradley-TerryThurstoneMostellerFull: Full Pairing for Thurstone-MostellerThurstoneMostellerPart: Partial Pairing for Thurstone-Mosteller
Which Model Do I Want?
- Bradley-Terry rating models follow a logistic distribution over a player's skill, similar to Glicko.
- Thurstone-Mosteller rating models follow a gaussian distribution, similar to TrueSkill. Gaussian CDF/PDF functions differ in implementation from system to system (they're all just chebyshev approximations anyway). The accuracy of this model isn't usually as great either, but tuning this with an alternative gamma function can improve the accuracy if you really want to get into it.
- Full pairing should have more accurate ratings over partial pairing, however in high k games (like a 100+ person marathon race), Bradley-Terry and Thurstone-Mosteller models need to do a calculation of joint probability which involves is a k-1 dimensional integration, which is computationally expensive. Use partial pairing in this case, where players only change based on their neighbors.
- Plackett-Luce (default) is a generalized Bradley-Terry model for k ≥ 3 teams. It scales best.
2 Oct 23, 2021
624 Jan 06, 2023
126 Dec 28, 2022
4.6k Dec 31, 2022
1.1k Jan 07, 2023
720 Dec 25, 2022
32k Dec 30, 2022
7 Nov 09, 2022
6.7k Jan 08, 2023
1 Feb 13, 2022
5.2k Jan 03, 2023
4 Dec 27, 2022
4.2k Dec 29, 2022
270 Jan 06, 2023
131 Dec 12, 2022
179 Dec 31, 2022
1 Jan 27, 2022
2 Dec 10, 2021
1 Jun 27, 2022
747 Jan 05, 2023